Wildlife Tracking at Gold Creek by Julia
I participated in the wildlife
tracking field trip on February 2nd along the Gold Creek snowshoeing
trail by Snoqualmie pass. We made it to the Gold Creek trail by 1pm. The
weather was a bit wet but not too bad, and the sun even shined on us a few
times! I chose to go on this field trip because I’ve been to the zoo and the
aquarium many times before, and I wanted to do something new. I also don’t have
much experience in tracking wildlife and I thought this trip would be a chance
for me to learn more about the animals that live around us.
Figure 1. Domestic dog prints found
in the snow
It didn’t take long for us to find
some prints in the snow. Our first mystery was Figure 1. It was hard to tell
exactly what animal left those prints because they look a bit sporadic, but
upon closer examination we could see paw prints. It was determined to be a
domestic dog print. The second site to see was that of a beaver, seen in Figure
2. It was fairly easy to see the gnaw marks from teeth along the tree (a close
up picture of the teeth marks can be seen in Figure 3), and it’s well known
that beavers eat wood. We had also seen something that looked like a dam
further up in the water. Something I learned about beavers is that they eat
cambium off of trees, and can knock an entire tree over and use it for dam
building. The tree they knocked over was eaten with their faces sideways and
their teeth scraping into the side of the tree in a horizontal fashion, while
the tree they had gnawed on only a little bit was bitten straight into. Beavers’
teeth are one of their adaptations that allow them to survive. They have really
strong teeth in order to tear up the trees, and I learned that their teeth are continuously
growing in order to make up for the wear and tear caused by such heavy use.
Figure 2. A tree
knocked down by a beaver
Figure
3. A chunk of wood gnawed on by a beaver, with teeth marks visible.
Some tracks that were easier to
identify were seen in Figure 4. Everyone was able to narrow it down to either a
rabbit or a squirrel, and it turns out that it was a squirrel. I learned from
Tom that the tracks of a bunny tend to be longer and the front feet leave
deeper holes in the snow than the back feet do. This is because a rabbit’s
movements are to propel itself forward, and in doing so they put more of their
weight on their back feet. It’s possible that their feet are longer to help
support their weight during the hopping movement.
Figure 4. The tracks of a squirrel in
the snow
Adaptations like the teeth of a
beaver or the feet of a rabbit play a huge role in evolution, and therefore
pertain to all biology courses. What I found to be more centered around 212
material had to do with animal migration and how our highways impact wildlife.
A big part of the trip was understanding the influence we have on animal
populations. We talked about how highways can cause geographical division
between populations, which got me thinking about allopatric speciation, since
building a road can suddenly cut off contact between individuals in a
population. We also discussed how separating populations can make them more
fragile because they have less resources for things like food and shelter, and
because we create a smaller population size. As we have learned, genetic drift
causes a lot of problems for small populations. It’s possible that lack of
genetic diversity and stability in wildlife populations may be attributed to
the development of infrastructure, which wasn’t something I had thought about
before.
Wildlife tracking is important in
understanding how different organisms interact with one another on a day to day
basis. This information is particularly useful when we have land that we want
to build on, or animals that we want to hunt for food. Wildlife tracking has
been crucial in the development of the I-90 corridor because it’s allowed us to
build I-90 around the lives of the animals we need to protect in order to
maintain our ecosystems. When we apply tracking to the development of
interstates, we can design overpasses and bridges that animals can use to move
from one side of the road to the other. In this way, we can still build what we
need without cutting off food supply or reducing population sizes of different
species. This also protects humans from hitting animals like deer while we
drive.
Aside from the time spent wildlife tracking, I also learned
about several organizations, one of which is Conservation Northwest. What’s
really cool about this organization is that they bring together scientists and citizens
to monitor regions of Washington that federal and state organizations do not
have the funding to maintain. As they collect information through wildlife
tracking, they report that information so it may be considered in the
development of interstates like 1-90. This is incredibly valuable because
federal organizations do not monitor all wildlife or even all areas around I-90
that need to be considered, and having a group that connects civilians and
scientists while working to maintain biodiversity in Western Washington has
helped workers build I-90 in a more thoughtful manner.
The societal aspect of this trip
was the problem of needing to connect the Eastern and Western portions of Washington
state while the science portion was really about migration and being able to
sustain healthy populations around where we live. Sometimes in my studies I
feel torn in a battle between trying to please humans and blissfully living the
life I want to live, or trying to be considerate and knowledgeable of the other
organisms I live with, like plants and animals. My relationship between these
two things has been changed because I realized that it’s possible to find a
middle ground, and it’s possible to get people to work together on both sides
of the argument to produce something remarkable. The most important thing I
learned was really the importance of those migration bridges that allow animals
to travel back and forth. Beforehand I knew that building roads influenced
animals, but I had never thought about it in terms of speciation, genetic
drift, or cutting off food and resources to those organisms. After having taken
this class I can understand a bit better what the consequences are for those
populations when we build without thinking.





Nice post! reading what you guys did at the wildlife tracking makes me want to go there too. It must have been fun figuring out the mystery prints of animals. what thing you wrote that I found interesting was that a beaver can knock an entire tree over. I didn't know that beavers were that strong.
ReplyDeleteHey Julia,
ReplyDeleteAwesome post! I wish I could've gone to the wildlife tracking field-trip but time didn't workout for me. I have never really thought of how interesting tracking wildlife would be so much fun and full of knowledge! I love that you guys say bunnies track and how you identified it because of its deeper track on their back feet.
Hi Julia, your post is fantastic! Very informative but also fun to read about what you guys found on your trip. Last winter quarter, I participated in the Wildlife Monitoring project in Mukilteo at the Lower Japanese Gulch. It was so cool to be able to go where most citizens aren't allowed as the activity of the animals is much higher there. On site we saw tracks made by what were believed to be Barred Owls and Mallard Ducks, as well as coyotes, domestic dogs, and raccoons. I learned that that a coyote’s track will appear much lighter or less imprinted than a domestic dogs due to the fact they usually move at a swift pace and have a specific destination to conserve energy. Maybe this could explain why the paw prints you saw were left by a domestic dog rather than a coyote.
ReplyDeleteI'm really interested in learning more about the organizations like Conservation Northwest, as I'm hoping to be involved in something of that degree! I love that people come together in order to protect and maintain the habitats of our wildlife as we continue to build our own communities in the future.